Compare · aggregator vs aggregator · 3 shared models
fal.ai vs Replicate
Split decision: 1–1, 1 tie across 3 shared models — there's no overall price winner, so choose per model.
Which is cheaper, fal.ai or Replicate?
As of Jul 30, 2026, fal.ai and Replicate split 1–1 across 3 shared models, the biggest gap on PixVerse V6, where fal.ai is 50% cheaper ($0.045/s vs $0.090/s) — there's no overall price winner, so pick by the model you actually run. 1 of 3 shared model is a tie (within ±2%).
Verified Jul 30, 2026
Head-to-head · 3 models · best comparable tier · ±2% tie rule
Model-by-model
Each provider's cheapest comparable (~720p-class) rate per model. Prices within 2% are called a tie, not a win — a $0.0001 gap is noise, not a reason to switch. Every rate shows its tier and whether it's directly verified or reported.
| Model | fal.ai | Replicate | Cheaper | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PixVerse V6 | $0.045 /s · 720p standard · verified | $0.090 /s · 720p standard · verified | fal.ai−50% | $0.045/s checked Jul 30, 2026 |
| Seedance 2.0 | $0.24 /s · 720p fast · verified | $0.18 /s · 720p standard · reported | Replicate−26% | $0.062/s checked Jul 30, 2026 |
| LTX-2 | $0.040 /s · 1080p fast · verified | $0.040 /s · 1080p fast · reported | Tie | ±0 checked Jul 30, 2026 |
These calls are per-second list price. The right provider also depends on how much you actually generate — run your own numbers with real clip lengths and resolutions.
Answers · computed from the 3-model comparison