How much does Luma Ray 3.2 cost via API?
As of Jul 30, 2026, the cheapest verified Luma Ray 3.2 API rate is $0.20/second on fal.ai (standard tier, 720p), so a 5-second clip costs about $1.00. Across 2 providers tracked, Luma Ray 3.2 runs $0.10–$0.40 per second.
Verified Jul 30, 2026
Model · Luma AI · 2 providers tracked3/4 verified
Luma Ray 3.2 API Pricing
Luma AI's reasoning video model (shipping as Ray 3.2) generating cinematic 5s or 10s clips from text or start/end images with multi-keyframe control and native HDR output. Tracked across 2 providers · 4 price points — all normalized to cost per second.
Luma Ray 3.2 pricing — quick facts
- Cheapest verified rate: $0.20/second on fal.ai (standard, 720p, audio off) — checked Jul 30, 2026.
- Across 2 providers, Luma Ray 3.2 runs $0.10–$0.40/second (4.0× spread).
- A 5-second clip costs $1.00 at the cheapest verified rate, up to $2.00 at the priciest tracked tier.
- Luma Ray 3.2 capabilities: Adds 16-bit EXR export for professional pipelines; priced per generated second scaling by resolution (540p/720p/1080p).
Bottom line: fal.ai at $0.20/s is both the cheapest verified and the sensible default choice.
Price table · 4 points · 3 verified
Every Luma Ray 3.2 price, by provider
Sorted by normalized $/second — billed per-clip at source, all converted to cost per second of output. Hover a price for its derivation; every row links to the provider's published source. Range: $0.10–$0.40/s (4.0× spread).
| Provider | Trust | Mode | Tier | Res | Audio | $ / second | 5s clip | Verified | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| fal.aiCHEAPEST VERIFIEDTry → | high | Text → Video | standard | 540p | — | $0.10 | $0.50 | VERIFIED 46d ago | source ↗ |
| fal.ai | high | Text → Video | standard | 720p | — | $0.20 | $1.00 | VERIFIED 46d ago | source ↗ |
| Luma (official) | high | Text → Video | standard | 720p | — | $0.20 | $1.00 | REPORTED 46d ago | source ↗ |
| fal.ai | high | Text → Video | standard | 1080p | — | $0.40 | $2.00 | VERIFIED 46d ago | source ↗ |
How each price was normalized (derivations & sources)
- fal.ai · standard · 540p: fal Luma Ray 3.2 t2v: $0.50 per 5s clip at 540p; $0.50/5 = $0.10/s (cheapest Ray 3 tier) source ↗
- fal.ai · standard · 720p: fal Luma Ray 3.2 t2v: $1 per 5s clip at 720p; $1/5 = $0.20/s (10s = $2 confirms same rate) source ↗
- Luma (official) · standard · 720p: Ray 3.2 runs on the Luma Agents API surfaced via fal (endpoint luma/agent/ray/v3.2); $1 per 5s at 720p = $0.20/s; Luma's own docs did not expose a clean public per-second table so this mirrors the Luma-operated endpoint source ↗
- fal.ai · standard · 1080p: fal Luma Ray 3.2 t2v: $2 per 5s clip at 1080p; $2/5 = $0.40/s source ↗
Cost modelling
What a clip actually costs
At the cheapest verified rate (fal.ai) versus the most expensive rate we track for Luma Ray 3.2 — the same output, same model, different invoice.
| Clip length | Cheapest (fal.ai) | Most expensive tracked | You save |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 seconds | $1.00 | $2.00 | $1.00 |
| 10 seconds | $2.00 | $4.00 | $2.00 |
| 15 seconds | $3.00 | $6.00 | $3.00 |
Run your own clip length and volume in the cost calculator.
Provider takes · 2 carriers
Choosing a Luma Ray 3.2 provider
Computed from the live dataset — cheapest first. “+” is why you'd pick it, “−” is why you'd skip it.
fal.ai
- Cheapest verified rate we track: $0.20/s
- High-trust production choice
Luma (official)
- First-party API from the model's developer
- Pricing is reported, not directly verified — confirm before production use
Ranked on each provider's best comparable (~720p-class) rate for Luma Ray 3.2 — 2 like-for-like rows.
Luma Ray 3.2 pricing FAQ
How much does the Luma Ray 3.2 API cost?
What is the cheapest Luma Ray 3.2 API provider?
How much does a 5-second Luma Ray 3.2 video cost?
How is Luma Ray 3.2 priced?
Keep comparing
Compare with other models
Same normalization, every other model we track — cheapest rate first.
$ price history · cheapest verified rate
Luma Ray 3.2 over time
One point per daily verification run — real captures, never interpolated.
computed 2026-08-01: recency 49, mentions 0 (0 tok/0 src), community 50 (no votes) → heat 30